![]() And that came to pass, creating the App Store model now on the defensive against trustbusters and aggrieved developers around the globe. ![]() As Zittrain mentioned in passing, a promised software development kit – unreleased at the time – might allow third-parties to create iPhone apps with Apple's permission. ![]() These are more like iPods than they are like computers.Īpple however backed away from a strict appliance model. The last thing you want is to have loaded three apps on your phone and then you go to make a call and it doesn’t work anymore. You don’t want your phone to be like a PC. We define everything that is on the phone. In his 2008 book, The Future of the Internet - And How to Stop It, Jonathan Zittrain pointed to the "sterile" iPhone as the endgame, quoting Steve Job's repudiation of third-party innovation on the newly introduced smartphone: The erosion of user agency – the ability to control and modify one's own software and hardware – has been ongoing for years, driven by profit-minded tech giants, repair-hostile hardware designs, and the realization that the openness of the PC era would pose problems as phones and home appliances became more dependent on vulnerability-prone software and processors. What's clear is that there are more than a few open privacy issues that have been raised about these proposals what's less obvious is whether Google, as the dominant player on the web, will accommodate critics or ignore them. What they *don't* do is break URLs and the origin model. And he insists that they don't break URLs.īundles allow folks who opt into bundles to have others serve their an opt-in basis. ĭespite Google's disinterest in responding officially, various Google engineers challenged Snyder's claims and defended the technology on Twitter.Īlex Russell, senior staff software engineer at Google, contends that Snyder has misunderstood the various web packaging proposals, perhaps deliberately. It’s also bad for privacy protections, as outlined by Brave in this post. This is part of Google’s ambition to serve the whole web from their own servers while pretending it’s coming from elsewhere. I’m glad to see Brave speaking out agains WebBundle tech (AMP 2.0). Apple WebKit engineer John Wilander filed two issues arguing that ad tech companies could use website packaging to bypass user privacy decisions.Īnd Maciej Stachowiak, a software engineer who leads the development of Apple's WebKit, also voiced opposition to Web Bundles. Snyder is not alone in his doubts about the spec. "I think the way that they're shooting for them is not valuable and has a kind of insidious side effect of allowing other things that are user hostile." ![]() "I think that some of the ends of these tools are shooting for are valuable," he said. ![]() Snyder concedes that some of the goals these tools aim to realize may be valuable, like assertions of resource integrity through signatures, but he objects to means being applied to get there. Separately, Google has been working to hide full URLs in the Chrome omnibox. SWF files or PDF files, just a big blob that you can't reason about independently, and it'll become an all or nothing deal," Snyder explained in a phone interview with The Register. "The concern is that by making URLs not meaningful, like just these arbitrary indexes into a package, the websites will become things like. Web Bundles set up private namespaces for URLs, so privacy tools that rely on URLs don't work. That becomes difficult when the file isn't easily teased out of a larger whole. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |